World War III: Can U.S. Help Both Israel and Ukraine?

Do you stand with Israel, or Ukraine, or both? Or for peace?

When 60 Minutes asked President Biden “Are the wars in Israel and Ukraine more than the United States can take on at the same time?”, he said: “We’re the United States of America, for God’s sake. The most powerful nation in the history of the world. The history of the world. We can take care of both of these and still maintain our overall international defense. We have the capacity to do this, and we have the obligation to do this. We are an essential nation, to paraphrase the former secretary of state. If we don’t, who does?”

 Evidently, this graph is of no concern to him:

Where the dollars are to come from is not the only question: Where do they go? And what comes next?

            And how are our supplies of ammunition and weapons we might need to defend ourselves here? And is our industrial capacity capable of replacing what we sent to Ukraine?

The U.S. has sent two aircraft carrier groups to the Middle East. Why? To help turn Gaza into a crater, or is war with Iran, and Syria, and ultimately Russia the intention (or just a possible result)?

More is going on here than meets the eye, writes attorney Jeff Childers.

Some say the danger of nuclear war is growing rapidly as tensions and provocations increase, and China will soon reach parity with the U.S. nuclear arsenal. Are you prepared for the consequences of escalation of hostilities—including terrorist attacks from sleeper cells here and/or an economic meltdown?

Additional information:

The New World Alignment

Civil Defense Perspectives vol. 38 #5

During his invasion of Kuwait, President George H.W. Bush popularized the idea of the New World Order. Today, American diplomats frequently invoke the “rules-based international order,” to which all nations are supposed to submit. The underlying assumption seems to be that the rule maker will be the World’s Only Superpower, the center of a unipolar world. The recognized physical capital might be Washington, D.C., but the ruling elite would be globalists, who might be in Davos, Switzerland, or anywhere else.

The key concept of the globalists’ World Economic Forum (WEF) is that “you will own nothing.” As with communism, private property would be abolished, and “the people” or a few megacorporations would own everything and allow you, if you are sufficiently compliant, to use your fair share for the “common good” and the good of the Planet.

Continue reading “The New World Alignment”